Lagerquist Accounting Blog
Read the latest blog articles from Lagerquist Accounting and Advisory.
Subscribe for Blog Updates
Recent Blog Articles
How an Outsourced CFO Can Help You Establish Accounting Practices To Minimize Risk and Maximize Profit
An outsourced CFO can provide your small business with the accounting services and financial management advice you need to successfully navigate from your break-even point, so you can maximize profits and boost ROI.Read more
Leveraging the Expertise of an Accounting and Advisory Firm to Support and Optimize Your Accounting System
This fourth article in our series outlines the benefits of partnering with an external advisory firm in optimizing your business finances. We look at the comprehensive services offered by outsourced accounting specialists and how they can support your in-house teams and processes toward ideal results throughout the work year. Bookkeeping is an essential aspect of […]Read more
Your Accounting and Advisory Firm Can Help You Avoid These 5 Major Pitfalls
Lagerquist’s third part of an in-depth blog series explores how partnering with a reliable external accounting and advisory firm can help your company avoid five of the biggest pitfalls faced by businesses. External accounting specialists provide extensive real-world experience that help companies navigate the most significant financial challenges with minimal guesswork.Read more
How New Lease Accounting Rules May Impact Your Business
Posted by Sylvia Lagerquist, CPA
Effective accounting for leases has traditionally been managed under a dual model in which leases are classified and reported under two different models. As defined through current accounting standards, a majority of leases are often not reported on a company’s balance sheet. The amounts involved can be significant, as many businesses lease much of their equipment.
The existing accounting models for leases require lessees and lessors to classify their leases as either capital leases or operating leases, and to account for those leases differently. For investor-held companies, these models have been criticized for failing to meet the needs of investors and other users of financial statements because they do not always provide a faithful representation of leasing transactions.
The two leading accounting standards organizations – the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) have been working jointly on strategies to improve the clarity and transparency of lease accounting for some time. In 2015, it is expected that both entities will release new rules for how businesses track lease expenses under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).
The proposed new standard, which was released for comments as an exposure draft in 2013-2014 and which is expected to be finalized in late 2015, would require lessees to include all leases, including leases of equipment and other assets, generally classified as operating leases, on the balance sheet.
This will force an enormous number of “off-balance-sheet” leases to be brought onto companies’ books, and it will change the way lease liabilities are calculated.
The reason that many leases are “off-balance-sheet” is because of the historic distinction between an operating lease and a capital lease. For example, if your company leases a Pitney-Bowes postal meter, that is considered an operating lease because you rent the equipment but can never own it. Therefore, the cost of the meter’s lease is treated as current expense. Office space leases are treated the same way.
This is contrasted with capital leases, where you might pay a monthly fee for the lease on a rent-to-own basis with a fixed term, and then end the term with a ‘bargain buy-out’ (like a $1.00 payment) in order to own the equipment in the end. In this case, you are financing a purchase rather than renting assets indefinitely.
Capital leases, therefore, are treated as assets and liabilities on the books. In contrast, operating leases are usually addressed in financial statements with footnotes, where the company may indicate the remaining term of its operating leases since these are legal obligations the company has entered into.
For most real estate leases, a lessee would report a straight-line lease expense in its income statement. However, for most other leases, such as equipment or vehicles, the lessee would depreciate the asset over its useful life and report interest expense on the lease liability over the term of the lease.
Large companies or those with extensive leased assets will follow these new rules because their auditing processes are based upon GAAP principles. In addition, companies that are publicly traded or those who anticipate selling shares in the future will want to follow the rules precisely because the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is expected to adopt them as regulatory requirements.
However, privately held small businesses may elect to make changes depending upon their current and future accounting practices and objectives, including whether or not they operate on a cash or accrual basis and whether or not they anticipate pursuing future transactions (merger, acquisition, strategic sale, public offering) that may trigger or strongly benefit from strict “big GAAP” compliance. It is also not known whether the IRS will apply the changes envisioned in these new standards to rules for business taxes.
To learn more about the anticipated new FASB lease accounting rules and how they might apply to your business or to your tax strategy, consult with your CPA today.
5 Ways to Prepare for New Lease Accounting Rules
Project Update: Leases—Joint Project of the FASB and the IASB
Between Big GAAP and Little GAAP, There are Many Gaps
Image Credit: Tomi Knuutila (Flickr @ Creative Commons)
One response to “How New Lease Accounting Rules May Impact Your Business”
Leave a Reply
Lagerquist Accounting Blog
Welcome to the Lagerquist Accounting & Advisory Blog.
In the statement:
“For example, if your company leases a Pitney-Bowes postal meter, that is considered an operating lease because you rent the equipment but can never own it.”
can you point me to the ASC guidance that supports this? My company is doing an assessment of a postal meter, which we cannot legally own, but I cannot find anything under either 840 or 842 that says it is automatically an operating lease.